5 members
4 members
2 members
4 members
5 members
I'm going to start with Question 5 (about whether the book or the film get outdated), but then wander into some of the other questions as well.Posted on October 13, 2009 at 9:00am —
Our Year 10 satire course poses the question: ‘Should satire have an ethical intent?” It’s a bad… Continue Posted on February 15, 2009 at 12:27pm —
Posted on February 8, 2009 at 12:44pm —

Posted on February 8, 2009 at 10:48am —
Posted on February 3, 2009 at 9:46pm —
Added by Steve Shann
© 2009 Created by Steve Shann on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
Comment Wall (13 comments)
You need to be a member of 2009Satire to add comments!
Join this Ning Network
I'd really appreciate your comments on my Guided Inquiry 1 blog, I'd especially like to know your opinion on whether books convey the 'writers vision' towards their audience more effectively. Also, I really took on board your comments on standard of commitment today and I'm going to take my blog posts (and my thinking!) up a notch,
cheers
Hugo
Cheers,
Sam
The three texts that I have selected are My Country, Catch 22 and Only Fools Rush In. The purpose of the first text, My Country, is to ridicule the ideas proposed in Dorothy McKellars original poem. Catch 22 is a clever text that illustrates how there are situations where there is an illusion of choice, but there is actually no real choice to make. The third text, Only Fools Rush In is a text that demonstrates the importance of just waiting a bit, by comparing the delaying of the start of the Autralian emissons trading scheme to other examples where rushed descisions are made.
As a satirical text, My Country utilises many satirical techniques to deliver its message. One of the major satirical techniques that Oscar Krahnvohl, the author, uses is Burlesque. Burlesque is a literary technique that treats a serious subject in a trivial or even vulgar way. In the case of this text, the author is treating the originaltext by Dorothy Mckellar with exaggeration to the pint where it is almost vulgar. The original text shows the beauty of the natural Australia, which theis text then exploits to the point where it the image of a beautiful land into a poluted, degraded and tack land, hidden behind a thin veil of beauty. The main reason the text uses such exaggeretion and Burlesque is to show the reader how easily specific bits of information can be used to portray somthing in a much better light than if the whole picture was used.
I will then talk about the use of juxtaposition and ridicule.
Comments please.
I will post what I have written so far as a blog
Thanks
James
I was just wondering if it would be appropriate to talk about the literary technique Burlesque in reference to Text 2, assuming the reader has prior knowledge of the original poem by Dorothy McKellar?
Thanks
James
Cheers
Jonno
Eliot
View All Comments